Apparently James Holmes has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. This week, copies of his notebooks were released which seem to show that he carefully selected his target (the movie theater) and also seemed to be quite aware that what he was doing was wrong. This would argue against a finding of legal insanity. He knew what he was doing and knew it was wrong.

The writings also make it clear that he was (and probably is) very mentally ill. His illness seemed to torment him, from what I’ve heard on the news. This is something I’ve seen in many of my clients over the years. Very often they know something is wrong with them but they don’t know what to do about it. I find it almost heartbreaking that Holmes seems to have studied neuroscience in an attempt to figure out what was wrong with him. I can almost imagine the despair when his studies didn’t provide him with the answers he sought.

From what I’ve gathered in the news, it seems unlikely he will be found insane by the standards in Colorado. That’s not to say that this killer isn’t sick. He most definitely is. I suppose his illness will become important again when we get to sentencing.

As an example of the difference between the legal term “insanity” and the more medical term of “mentally ill” or even “schizophrenic”, this is about as perfect as you can get.

BTW: we are dealing here with a serious mental illness like schizophrenia. We are not talking about a personality disorder or psychopathy. Please, please do not confuse psychopathy with “psychotic” or insane. Personally I do think psychopaths are “sick”, but not like Holmes. Apples and oranges, folks. Apples and oranges.

Colorado theater shooting suspect James Holmes