Last night I watched the final episode of the tv show “Crossing Lines”. It featured a psychiatrist who had been treating a bad guy in prison for a couple years, supposedly twice a week. Now, I fully understand “poetic license” and I acknowledge that procedures in Europe are likely to be different from those followed in the US. Still and all, it struck me that this psychiatrist was supposed to be doing some sort of therapy with the bad guy. This was, of course, never specified.
I find it unlikely that a psychiatrist, who usually focuses on medication management, would be doing such therapy, whatever it was. Sure, the story needed to have the psychiatrist “fall in love” with the bad guy (or not). Or perhaps she needed to get bored or whatever it was that was supposed to motivate her. If the story needed to have a professional in frequent and protracted contact with the bad guy, why oh why couldn’t the author have specified her profession as a psychologist? It would have changed nothing to the story line but it would have made the story more plausible. She would still have been a “doctor”, carrying the status that involves. A simple change and the story would have made more sense.
BTW, the writers did handle another aspect fairly well. When questioned about the psychiatrist staying in the home of a former patient, the doc makes it clear that the friendship developed a year after termination of the therapeutic relationship. In the US, developing a personal, sexual relationship with a client is a big no-no. Really big no-no. In California, a psychologist is restricted from a sexual relationship following a therapy relationship for two years. Non-sexual relationships are not specifically mentioned. So, why did the writer’s make a big deal about this? I’m not sure but at least they were aware of the potential for an ethical problem here.
I don’t understand why the writers of this show felt that they needed to have the doc be a psychiatrist. There was never an issue about medications. Why not, then, use the profession that would have made some sense?

